heads up: which position is better |
|
Posted Mon Jan 30, 2006 5:35 pm GMT by greathuskie
first or second to act?
they both have their pros and cons, first to act can always make the initial bet at the pot and possibly pick it up, but he might also get reraised
second to act can someones gauge his position based on the first to acts bet or lackthereof, but he can also get checkraised into oblivion
i cant decide personally, which is better?
Did you know that participating in a poker forum can help you improve your own game? Be it by sharing experiences or simply asking for help, participation in a forum helps you focus and keep 'on topic' which will help you improve your game. You can learn from other players feedback and from their experiences. Why the THP poker forums? We offer one of the best managed texas holdem poker forums available, and the community within is far more friendly than those typicaly found on other sites. We've made a 'lurkers edition' of the poker forum available here on Holdem Poker Online, but we encourage all visitors to register and join in on the conversations on TexasHoldem-Poker.com
Posted Mon Jan 30, 2006 5:39 pm GMT by supafrey
always last.
Posted Mon Jan 30, 2006 6:02 pm GMT by zinn0
| supafrey wrote: | | always last. |
Posted Mon Jan 30, 2006 6:29 pm GMT by tame_deuces
I second the above.
Posted Mon Jan 30, 2006 8:19 pm GMT by snoogins47
Let's rig up a game, I'll be in position the whole time.
Posted Thu Feb 02, 2006 7:19 pm GMT by Loonbat
The one which has more chips.
Posted Thu Feb 02, 2006 8:17 pm GMT by xDiamond_CutteRx
Button. Any game, any time. Sure, first to act is first to bluff, but give me position baby.
|
|
