Posted Wed Feb 15, 2006 5:43 pm GMT by arras
After reading soup dog's thread I decided to post my stats to get some input.
If I move up again, should I expect my winrate to be cut in half again? 
Oh and don't ask about the total amount won being negative 
Did you know that participating in a poker forum can help you improve your own game? Be it by sharing experiences or simply asking for help, participation in a forum helps you focus and keep 'on topic' which will help you improve your game. You can learn from other players feedback and from their experiences. Why the THP poker forums? We offer one of the best managed texas holdem poker forums available, and the community within is far more friendly than those typicaly found on other sites. We've made a 'lurkers edition' of the poker forum available here on Holdem Poker Online, but we encourage all visitors to register and join in on the conversations on TexasHoldem-Poker.com
Posted Wed Feb 15, 2006 7:27 pm GMT by xDiamond_CutteRx
Goes to show you... it's very hard to beat the rake at these stakes.
Posted Wed Feb 15, 2006 7:32 pm GMT by Soup_dog
Thats for sure. I couldn't believe how much money I have put into the rake. I wish I had known about rakeback before I opened all of my accounts.
Posted Wed Feb 15, 2006 8:01 pm GMT by supafrey
rake on pt is NOT calculated correctly at all. It's smaller.
Posted Wed Feb 15, 2006 8:25 pm GMT by arras
| supafrey wrote: | | rake on pt is NOT calculated correctly at all. It's smaller. |
that is what i was thinking, no way thats right.
So any comments on the stats? My won $ at showdown % seems pretty low.
Posted Wed Feb 15, 2006 8:27 pm GMT by General Sal
| supafrey wrote: | | rake on pt is NOT calculated correctly at all. It's smaller. |
what is the rake exactly on .01/.02 NL poker?
Posted Wed Feb 15, 2006 9:10 pm GMT by age_of_sages
Arras, I think you need about 5000 more hands at each level before you can truly get a read on how you're doing, your sample size is simply too small.
|
|
