Posted Fri Feb 17, 2006 11:56 pm GMT by Dave B
#Game No : 3572893578
***** Hand History for Game 3572893578 *****
NL Texas Hold'em $11 Buy-in Trny:20260645 Level:1 Blinds(20/40) - Friday, February 17, 23:43:43 ET 2006
Table Speed #1137881 (Real Money)
Seat 1 is the button
Total number of players : 10
Seat 10: Revolver_O ( $1356 )
Seat 6: geekyboot ( $2000 )
Seat 7: nutprotector ( $1940 )
Seat 4: LETMO ( $100 )
Seat 9: mm22mm ( $1980 )
Seat 8: cby_player ( $3820 )
Seat 2: gupnboz ( $2080 )
Seat 1: bam7782 ( $1940 )
Seat 5: GHTiger ( $1960 )
Seat 3: garinmadsen3 ( $2824 )
Trny:20260645 Level:1
Blinds(20/40)
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to cby_player  
LETMO is all-In 100
GHTiger folds.
geekyboot folds.
nutprotector folds.
cby_player calls 100.
mm22mm folds.
Revolver_O folds.
bam7782 folds.
gupnboz folds.
garinmadsen3 raises 585.
cby_player folds.
** Dealing Flop **   
** Dealing Turn ** 
** Dealing River ** 
garinmadsen3 shows   two pairs, aces and queens.
LETMO shows   two pairs, kings and queens.
garinmadsen3 wins 525 chips from side pot #1 with two pairs, aces and queens.
garinmadsen3 wins 320 chips from the main pot with two pairs, aces and queens.
LETMO finished in tenth place.
Game #3572897853 starts.
Did you know that participating in a poker forum can help you improve your own game? Be it by sharing experiences or simply asking for help, participation in a forum helps you focus and keep 'on topic' which will help you improve your game. You can learn from other players feedback and from their experiences. Why the THP poker forums? We offer one of the best managed texas holdem poker forums available, and the community within is far more friendly than those typicaly found on other sites. We've made a 'lurkers edition' of the poker forum available here on Holdem Poker Online, but we encourage all visitors to register and join in on the conversations on TexasHoldem-Poker.com
Posted Sat Feb 18, 2006 12:34 am GMT by zinn0
Yep.
Posted Sat Feb 18, 2006 1:06 am GMT by Rikje-Suede
Before the flop, not too bad. After the flop it would be -EV, methinks.
Posted Sat Feb 18, 2006 2:42 am GMT by Phil14312
That sucks.
Posted Sat Feb 18, 2006 10:06 am GMT by greathuskie
had you called the flop would be different, so dont worry. but im sure you know that 
Posted Sat Feb 18, 2006 11:03 am GMT by Geno
You should probably quit playing.
Posted Tue Feb 28, 2006 3:31 pm GMT by BeerWench13
Doh! 
Still a good fold preflop though. Sucks the board did that to you. Couldn't they at least have been all hearts or something? 
Posted Tue Feb 28, 2006 5:34 pm GMT by xDiamond_CutteRx
The EV was not +1. Therefore you must fold.
Seriously though, I don't think this is where you want to put in that much more money.
Posted Tue Feb 28, 2006 6:23 pm GMT by Fat Tony
I think you made the right decision.
Posted Tue Feb 28, 2006 7:04 pm GMT by Hungry4Knowledge
Good fold, bad flop  Sucks laying down a winning had (Winning monster hand) But the cards can slap you in the face, even when their dead
Posted Wed Mar 01, 2006 5:37 am GMT by Muck
| xDiamond_CutteRx wrote: | | The EV was not +1. Therefore you must fold. |
It’s also risky to bet the idiot end of the royal flush...
Posted Wed Mar 01, 2006 9:20 am GMT by cayouche
It's a good fold. Risking your chip lead against second chip leader with a marginal hand, you made a good fold. A raise of 200-300, I would've probably called, but not 585.
Same thing happened to me, so I know how you feel. I had AJs. Two people started raising/reraising each other, and went all-in so I folded. Thing is, they had A7 vs. K9, I had a slight advantage preflop, and certainly leading after the flop when it gave me the royal.
Posted Wed Mar 01, 2006 12:19 pm GMT by TxShadow
Ouch 
Good fold though for sure. How often are you gonna get a flop like that with that hand?
Posted Wed Mar 01, 2006 1:18 pm GMT by Sean_in_NJ
| Muck wrote: | | xDiamond_CutteRx wrote: | | The EV was not +1. Therefore you must fold. |
It’s also risky to bet the idiot end of the royal flush... |
Good point. I'm not sure how much heat that hand could stand up to if it got a lot of action on the flop. I'd be concerned about the 2  3 wrap-around straight flush.
Posted Wed Mar 01, 2006 1:38 pm GMT by Dave B
Doesnt the J10 letter/number combo eliminate the wrap straight and bring us back to +1 EV?
Posted Wed Mar 01, 2006 1:45 pm GMT by BeerWench13
The 10 doesn't count as a number as it can be represented by the letter T. Sorry to burst you bubble.
| Quote: | | I'd be concerned about the 2 3 wrap-around straight flush. |
I hope if any newbies read this that they can sense the sarcasm. It would be terrible to think we've led them astray with a wrap-around.
|
|
