When the board makes a full....DO THIS |
|
Posted Tue Feb 21, 2006 6:10 pm GMT by truplaya_177
PokerStars Game #4052437864: Hold'em No Limit ($0.02/$0.05) - 2006/02/21 - 18:05:56 (ET)
Table 'Luna III' Seat #1 is the button
Seat 1: Freakowski ($9.23 in chips)
Seat 2: JAMESLE4 ($7.30 in chips)
Seat 3: tallith ($10.06 in chips)
Seat 4: Harrison57 ($9.95 in chips)
Seat 5: BonafideAdam ($4.90 in chips)
Seat 6: doug_103 ($1.63 in chips)
Seat 7: scat_thumbs ($8.74 in chips)
Seat 8: seb34s ($6.19 in chips)
Seat 9: jonnyfive420 ($2.49 in chips)
JAMESLE4: posts small blind $0.02
tallith: posts big blind $0.05
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to BonafideAdam  
Harrison57: calls $0.05
BonafideAdam: calls $0.05
doug_103: calls $0.05
scat_thumbs: folds
seb34s: folds
jonnyfive420: folds
Freakowski: raises $0.10 to $0.15
JAMESLE4: folds
tallith: folds
Harrison57: calls $0.10
BonafideAdam: calls $0.10
doug_103: folds
*** FLOP ***   
Harrison57: checks
BonafideAdam: bets $0.50
Freakowski: calls $0.50
Harrison57: folds
*** TURN *** 
BonafideAdam: checks
Freakowski: checks
*** RIVER *** 
BonafideAdam: checks
Freakowski: bets $0.50
BonafideAdam: raises $3.75 to $4.25 and is all-in
Freakowski: folds
BonafideAdam collected $2.47 from pot
BonafideAdam: doesn't show hand
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $2.57 | Rake $0.10
Board
Seat 1: Freakowski (button) folded on the River
Seat 2: JAMESLE4 (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 3: tallith (big blind) folded before Flop
Seat 4: Harrison57 folded on the Flop
Seat 5: BonafideAdam collected ($2.47)
Seat 6: doug_103 folded before Flop
Seat 7: scat_thumbs folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 8: seb34s folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 9: jonnyfive420 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
i knew he didn't have when he checked the turn
Did you know that participating in a poker forum can help you improve your own game? Be it by sharing experiences or simply asking for help, participation in a forum helps you focus and keep 'on topic' which will help you improve your game. You can learn from other players feedback and from their experiences. Why the THP poker forums? We offer one of the best managed texas holdem poker forums available, and the community within is far more friendly than those typicaly found on other sites. We've made a 'lurkers edition' of the poker forum available here on Holdem Poker Online, but we encourage all visitors to register and join in on the conversations on TexasHoldem-Poker.com
Posted Tue Feb 21, 2006 6:13 pm GMT by tame_deuces
We studied people's perceptions of own choices, their outcome and memory in psychology. Nothing mumbojumbo about it. Experimental settings and relying on solid statistics. IF he had it, you might have been convinced you knew that in advance too.
Apart from that.
NH. :D
Posted Tue Feb 21, 2006 8:55 pm GMT by NickHow
Of course, if you had the Ten you would have said "You call, its all over baby"
Posted Tue Feb 21, 2006 11:01 pm GMT by weirdofreek
Of course if he calls and the pot is split all that extra money you two put in the pot is raked and you both lose.
Posted Tue Feb 21, 2006 11:14 pm GMT by Dave B
You mean a 4, 10, JJ, QQ, KK or AA and you lose.
Posted Wed Feb 22, 2006 1:52 pm GMT by Sid Lambert
nobody else said it, so i will.....wut the crap are you doing calling w/ 2  3 preflop at utg+1 w/ 9 ppl at the table?....granted blinds are incredibly tiny compared to stacks, but still...that must've been a pretty passive table to make that justified
of course, i have been known to do some pretty goofy things preflop once in a blue moon when i think ppl have too good of a bead on me...
Posted Wed Feb 22, 2006 2:00 pm GMT by Jauron
| Sid Lambert wrote: | nobody else said it, so i will.....wut the crap are you doing calling w/ 2 3 preflop at utg+1 w/ 9 ppl at the table?....granted blinds are incredibly tiny compared to stacks, but still...that must've been a pretty passive table to make that justified
of course, i have been known to do some pretty goofy things preflop once in a blue moon when i think ppl have too good of a bead on me... |
sooted connectors dood!!
Posted Wed Feb 22, 2006 5:33 pm GMT by truplaya_177
| Jauron wrote: | | Sid Lambert wrote: | nobody else said it, so i will.....wut the crap are you doing calling w/ 2 3 preflop at utg+1 w/ 9 ppl at the table?....granted blinds are incredibly tiny compared to stacks, but still...that must've been a pretty passive table to make that justified
of course, i have been known to do some pretty goofy things preflop once in a blue moon when i think ppl have too good of a bead on me... |
sooted connectors dood!!
|
suited connectors can break people...normally i dont play those low suited connnectos though
Posted Wed Feb 22, 2006 8:43 pm GMT by Dat_Dude
| truplaya_177 wrote: |
suited connectors can break people |
So can 53o, but that doesn't mean you should go calling raises with it. You actually are VERY lucky he didn't call your bet on this hand, because you would have had to show down that you played one of the worst hands possible out of position and after a raise.
Posted Thu Feb 23, 2006 12:13 am GMT by Fat Tony
Why you guys be hatin'? They were soooooooted man.
Posted Mon Feb 27, 2006 8:36 am GMT by Muck
| truplaya_177 wrote: | | suited connectors can break people...normally i dont play those low suited connnectos though |
Indeed, they can break you 
Seriously though I don’t have anything against suited connectors but low ones are likely to make the idiot end of the straight and in this case the idiot flush (if there is such a thing). Which means most of the time you’ll either make nothing, not get paid off when you hit or lose a lot when you hit but they hit bigger.
Posted Mon Feb 27, 2006 3:31 pm GMT by truplaya_177
| Muck wrote: | | truplaya_177 wrote: | | suited connectors can break people...normally i dont play those low suited connnectos though |
Indeed, they can break you
Seriously though I don’t have anything against suited connectors but low ones are likely to make the idiot end of the straight and in this case the idiot flush (if there is such a thing). Which means most of the time you’ll either make nothing, not get paid off when you hit or lose a lot when you hit but they hit bigger. |
so in the future i should just "muck" them right muck?
Posted Mon Feb 27, 2006 4:07 pm GMT by wEbMaStEr
Who's the chica truplaya? From a distance (and with my failing eyesight she looks a little like katie price, but you're from Iowa so i doubt it, so who is she?
Posted Mon Feb 27, 2006 6:15 pm GMT by Skribbles
| truplaya_177 wrote: |
so in the future i should just "muck" them right muck? |
They are playable in the right situation. 23, unless from the blinds, isn't playable. You're drawing to a 3 high flush and the ass end of a straight. Dump it.
Posted Mon Feb 27, 2006 6:17 pm GMT by Soup_dog
| wEbMaStEr wrote: | | Who's the chica truplaya? From a distance (and with my failing eyesight she looks a little like katie price, but you're from Iowa so i doubt it, so who is she? |
She has amazing... lungs.
Posted Tue Feb 28, 2006 5:16 am GMT by Muck
Jordans lungs are bigger.
| truplaya_177 wrote: |
so in the future i should just "muck" them right muck? |
My personal experience at theses limits has been that you don’t need to get clever. It is possible to play these hands but it’s an unnecessary risk when the chances are the table has enough players who will pay off you’re made hands.
Posted Thu Mar 02, 2006 3:29 pm GMT by truplaya_177
| wEbMaStEr wrote: | | Who's the chica truplaya? From a distance (and with my failing eyesight she looks a little like katie price, but you're from Iowa so i doubt it, so who is she? |
i think it's britney spears. i don't really know.. i got it off this avatar program
|
|
