Posted Sun Apr 02, 2006 7:35 pm GMT by tutubird
Lets just say these environments are perfect.
You are in a full 25 NL Texas hold em table and the only hand you play are Pocket aces and you will always go all in preflop and only one person will call you with any hand and he/she will always have you covered . Lets say everytime a blind passes, you always rebuy the blind.
The chances of getting pocket aces are 220 to 1.
Every orbit will cost you .35 cents. ( Big blind .25 cents and Small blind .10 cents. )
So that means in the long run about every 22 orbits, you will get pocket aces.
So you will lose about $7.70 in blinds ( .35 cents per orbit x 22 orbits ) before you get pocket aces.
Correct me if im wrong but Pocket aces has a 85% advantage against a random hand.
And since you always rebuy your blind you will always have $25.00. So woulden't that mean in the long run you will win if you play this way in these conditions?
P.S I understand these environments are radical but im just curious.
Did you know that participating in a poker forum can help you improve your own game? Be it by sharing experiences or simply asking for help, participation in a forum helps you focus and keep 'on topic' which will help you improve your game. You can learn from other players feedback and from their experiences. Why the THP poker forums? We offer one of the best managed texas holdem poker forums available, and the community within is far more friendly than those typicaly found on other sites. We've made a 'lurkers edition' of the poker forum available here on Holdem Poker Online, but we encourage all visitors to register and join in on the conversations on TexasHoldem-Poker.com
Posted Sun Apr 02, 2006 7:59 pm GMT by suitedaces84
You're right but you won't get called anywhere near enough to make money.
Posted Sun Apr 02, 2006 8:35 pm GMT by ScanX
| suitedaces84 wrote: | | You're right but you won't get called anywhere near enough to make money. |
what he said + you wont win everytime
Posted Sun Apr 02, 2006 10:27 pm GMT by metal1
Based on your scenario yes you would come out ahead over a large hand sampling. In the real world, like the others have said, it wouldn't work.
Posted Sun Apr 02, 2006 11:36 pm GMT by notoriusjt2
try it and let me know how it works out.
Posted Mon Apr 03, 2006 12:16 am GMT by tutubird
notoriusjt2-try it and let me know how it works out
Again, I was just curious if it would work in that scenario. I never said that that is a winning style.
I guess its sort of like communism
Posted Mon Apr 03, 2006 12:38 am GMT by greathuskie
| tutubird wrote: |
I guess its sort of like communism |
hahahahahahahaha
i dont know why this is so funny
Posted Mon Apr 03, 2006 8:08 am GMT by snoogins47
Come on people
"In theory, if X, Y, and Z were always true, wouldn't B mean C?"
"LOL N00B X Y AND Z ARENT TRUE LOL"
Tutu wasn't concerned with whether or not his premises were correct. The question was: IF these premises are true, is my conclusion accurate?
It's like if you go to a Christian message board, and in a debate about whether or not masturbation is a sin based on biblical interpretation, you say "lol god is fake hes in ur MIND man" It's petty and moot, because you're trying to 'debate' by completely stepping outside the very framework that the debate takes place in.
Posted Mon Apr 03, 2006 3:34 pm GMT by Johny
That's one complicated post Snoogins. 
I'm not sure if you've ever actually posted at a Christian forum, but I have/do and some of them are plain nuts.
|
|
