is 1 carded quads any more likly in omaha then hold-em? |
|
Posted Fri May 19, 2006 6:42 pm GMT by kainARGH
It just fu cking kills me ,
AA10j double suited. Bet the pot on the cut off, 2 callers.
flop
577
check check I bet 1/2 the pot call call
turn J
check check I bet the asme as my flop bet, expecting if they have a 7 they will show it now with a re-raise ro theyll try and check to me on the river again and ill jsut check the river.
Now the river
7
So now all im thinking is , ok I have 2nd nuts save for 4 of a kind. And 4 of a kind..... that doesnt happen very often  guy bets the pot and before i could scream " oh f*ck me " I hit my call button.
sure enough , 1 carded quads.
So the question, If there are 3 of 1 card on board , are you to assume more often there is 1 carded quads - statistically speaking? of course reads come into play , But im just wondering because everyone gets 4 down cards , that means your more likly up against the 1 carded quads right?
I would have folded but it was .01-.02 pot limit , so what do i care , ill pay to see it 
Did you know that participating in a poker forum can help you improve your own game? Be it by sharing experiences or simply asking for help, participation in a forum helps you focus and keep 'on topic' which will help you improve your game. You can learn from other players feedback and from their experiences. Why the THP poker forums? We offer one of the best managed texas holdem poker forums available, and the community within is far more friendly than those typicaly found on other sites. We've made a 'lurkers edition' of the poker forum available here on Holdem Poker Online, but we encourage all visitors to register and join in on the conversations on TexasHoldem-Poker.com
Posted Fri May 19, 2006 6:54 pm GMT by ORGrinder
nm... brain fart.
anyway... i'd expect so, but perhaps someone else knows the omaha-math better.
Posted Sat May 20, 2006 1:06 am GMT by xDiamond_CutteRx
Yes it is more likely... with each person holding 4 hole cards instead of 2, it happens a considerably higher amount of the time.
Also, you do not have second nuts. JJ is second nuts.
Posted Sat May 20, 2006 9:57 am GMT by snoogins47
I guess AA is kinda the like, fourteenth nuts, isn't it?
Posted Sat May 20, 2006 11:35 am GMT by kainARGH
| snoogins47 wrote: | | I guess AA is kinda the like, fourteenth nuts, isn't it? |
Err , yes JJ is 2nd nuts.
Posted Sat May 20, 2006 12:26 pm GMT by JohnnyCache
The likelyhood that someone has the card to complete three to the board is greater.
The likelyhood of trips hitting the board should be roughly the same.
Posted Tue Jun 13, 2006 4:39 pm GMT by Jefecaminador
jj is 5th nuts... jacks full, 7s full of aces, kings, queens, jacks.
Posted Tue Jun 13, 2006 6:19 pm GMT by xDiamond_CutteRx
| Jefecaminador wrote: | | jj is 5th nuts... jacks full, 7s full of aces, kings, queens, jacks. |
Um, no, Jacks full always beats Sevens full.
|
|
