
Posted Thu Jul 20, 2006 9:53 am GMT by Cricket_Fire
How do you handle a mid-pair preflop, when there's a limp, and a raise in front of you? 1st hand at this table, no reads
PokerStars Game #5619908516: Hold'em No Limit ($0.01/$0.02) - 2006/07/20 - 10:50:31 (ET)
Table 'Eugenia V' 9-max Seat #4 is the button
Seat 2: Cricket_Fire ($2 in chips)
Seat 3: Patjeritzel ($4.65 in chips)
Seat 4: pecs680 ($1.58 in chips)
Seat 5: uwkkg ($8.71 in chips)
Seat 7: pocketDpairs ($1.93 in chips)
Seat 8: bluecat1234 ($4.02 in chips)
Seat 9: Chumbella ($1.29 in chips)
uwkkg: posts small blind $0.01
Gliber: is sitting out
Gliber leaves the table
pocketDpairs: posts big blind $0.02
Cricket_Fire: posts big blind $0.02
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to Cricket_Fire 
bluecat1234: calls $0.02
Chumbella: raises $0.06 to $0.08
Cricket_Fire:
Did you know that participating in a poker forum can help you improve your own game? Be it by sharing experiences or simply asking for help, participation in a forum helps you focus and keep 'on topic' which will help you improve your game. You can learn from other players feedback and from their experiences. Why the THP poker forums? We offer one of the best managed texas holdem poker forums available, and the community within is far more friendly than those typicaly found on other sites. We've made a 'lurkers edition' of the poker forum available here on Holdem Poker Online, but we encourage all visitors to register and join in on the conversations on TexasHoldem-Poker.com
Posted Thu Jul 20, 2006 9:58 am GMT by zinn0
TT is a good hand. TT is a better hand when we have position on the preflop aggressor. Personally, I don't care to play a strong but vulnerable hand such as TT multi-way. Reraise to isolate.
Posted Thu Jul 20, 2006 10:37 am GMT by Dat_Dude
| zinn0 wrote: | | Reraise to isolate. |
Yep. If Chumb comes over the top though, you have to consider laying it down unless his raise gives you the proper odds to try and hit your set and break him.
Posted Thu Jul 20, 2006 10:49 am GMT by Johny
I usually just flat call in this spot but that's because I prefer keeping pots smaller preflop.
I don't mind reraising though.
Posted Thu Jul 20, 2006 11:48 am GMT by Cricket_Fire
Thanks for the replys. I just called. 1 other play called. Flop came uncoordinated Qhigh. From there, it just got rediculous.
It was checked to 2nd caller, he min-bet. Original raiser folded, I called. Turn, check/called nother minbet. Same on river. He had 77
Now, when should I have raise here?
P.S. I know this hand was brutal, I was like a fish out of water :x
Posted Thu Jul 20, 2006 11:58 am GMT by Johny
I would have raised the flop.
Posted Thu Jul 20, 2006 11:58 am GMT by Dat_Dude
I think the way this hand played out, the only time I would have raised was preflop or on the flop to really find out if he has the Q. Other than that, I like calling those min-bets on the turn and river.
Posted Thu Jul 20, 2006 3:38 pm GMT by UrAteUp
| Dat_Dude wrote: | | I think the way this hand played out, the only time I would have raised was preflop or on the flop to really find out if he has the Q. Other than that, I like calling those min-bets on the turn and river. |
Nah I like the way he played it. If he had raised after the flop then chances are the other player would have called and got hero thinking he was most likely alreay beat. This way we assume we MIGHT be beat but villian could also be a donk.
Had a 10 hit this board on the flop then I would say raise after the flop but only a small min. raise. If a ten hit the turn then keep calling him down but raise the river.
|
|