Final Hand problem of a game i played |
|
Posted Sun Jul 30, 2006 2:07 pm GMT by cadman2871
Here is the Scenerio :
3 players left in the game.
Chip Leader had : A of spades and 10 of diamonds
Middle stack had : 8 of hearts and 3 of clubs
short stack had : J of diamonds and 7 of clubs
the chip leader called all in and the other two players called the all in so the 2 smaller stacks were truely all-in.
the flop came : A of diamonds, 6 of hearts and 2 of clubs
the turn came : Q of spades
the river came : 9 of hearts
that gave the chip leader: A , A , Q , 10 , 9
the middle stack : A , Q , 9 , 8 , 6
the small stack : A , Q , J , 9 , 7
so the chip leader won the hand and busted the other two remaining players, the question is, who comes in second, the small stack because they had the A, Q , J over the middle stacks A , Q , 9 ? Or would the middle stack win second place because they had more chips invested in the hand because they had more chips than the small stack even though they had the weaker hand under the small stack?/b
Did you know that participating in a poker forum can help you improve your own game? Be it by sharing experiences or simply asking for help, participation in a forum helps you focus and keep 'on topic' which will help you improve your game. You can learn from other players feedback and from their experiences. Why the THP poker forums? We offer one of the best managed texas holdem poker forums available, and the community within is far more friendly than those typicaly found on other sites. We've made a 'lurkers edition' of the poker forum available here on Holdem Poker Online, but we encourage all visitors to register and join in on the conversations on TexasHoldem-Poker.com
Posted Sun Jul 30, 2006 3:10 pm GMT by Raisor
Whoever had more chips comes in second, no matter the hand in that situation.
I believe...But I'm not sure.
Posted Sun Jul 30, 2006 4:26 pm GMT by Jefecaminador
the realy question is, why did the two short stacks CALL all in with such shitty hands....
Posted Sun Jul 30, 2006 6:07 pm GMT by crack
| Raisor wrote: | Whoever had more chips comes in second, no matter the hand in that situation.
I believe...But I'm not sure. |
What he said, except the I'mnot sure bit, because I am sure.
Posted Mon Jul 31, 2006 7:31 am GMT by MrDarling
yep chip count before the hand counts.
I hope this is a made up example and not a real style of play 
Posted Mon Jul 31, 2006 3:15 pm GMT by jimmer
| Jefecaminador wrote: | | the realy question is, why did the two short stacks CALL all in with such shitty hands.... |
good point, but it is a section for beginners, so don't go too hard on 'em, we all gotta learn somewhere
Posted Tue Aug 01, 2006 11:41 pm GMT by LeafsFan1122
| cadman2871 wrote: | Middle stack had : 8 of hearts and 3 of clubs
short stack had : J of diamonds and 7 of clubs |
I can't even say "because they were s00000ted." 
Posted Wed Aug 02, 2006 12:33 am GMT by vyni
In this situation, there is a side pot. Winner here takes all, but shortest stack going in could not cover the second stacks wager. When the pot is rewarded, short man goes out first (main pot eliminates short stack, side pot eliminates second stack).
|
|
