6-max vs full ring NL: What are the differences? |
|
Posted Tue Mar 13, 2007 11:24 am GMT by VisualCSharp
I'm a full ring 25NL player. Does anyone have an opinion on what the differences are between 6-max and rull ring play? Is play looser in general? Does more bluffing in position occur? Are the players generally better or worse than full ring?
Any comments appreciated.
Did you know that participating in a poker forum can help you improve your own game? Be it by sharing experiences or simply asking for help, participation in a forum helps you focus and keep 'on topic' which will help you improve your game. You can learn from other players feedback and from their experiences. Why the THP poker forums? We offer one of the best managed texas holdem poker forums available, and the community within is far more friendly than those typicaly found on other sites. We've made a 'lurkers edition' of the poker forum available here on Holdem Poker Online, but we encourage all visitors to register and join in on the conversations on TexasHoldem-Poker.com
Posted Tue Mar 13, 2007 12:09 pm GMT by Ensano
they're far more agressive...
Posted Tue Mar 13, 2007 1:41 pm GMT by MrDarling
players are even more lose in short hand - rightly so. But since they are already so loose in micro levels, they are ridiculously loose in 6 hand.
Players are slightly less passive.
If you play good post flop, give it a go.
Posted Tue Mar 13, 2007 8:12 pm GMT by Moon_Child
10max, i like to wait for hands, premium hands and maybe play the pot odds ones... and basically, it's a waiting game...
6max, bet position... steal, easier to make bluffs
and just beat the players by skills rather than cards. you can get away with a lot in 6 max that you can't in 10
person, i open up 4 tables, 2 6max and 2 10max...
while i watch and observe my players on 6max and just wait on the 10 whiling folding rags
thats how i play them, im not sure if everyone agree's
but my 2cents ^^
|
|
